Attorney Jill Clark, who is in the midst of both a very real lawyer discipline crisis plus alleged health problems of a dubious nature, recently broke off a big chunk of crazy cheese and tried to see if the federal court would be so kind as to make her a sandwich...
This recent "not quite a filing because we aren't allowed to do that anymore" document is a a treasure trove of future blog investigations and writing but for now I don't have the time or energy to dig into this Sam's Club size container of crazy-piled-on-crazy.
No reason readers shouldn't enjoy them ASAP, however.
Click here for the PDF and, like Jill Clark, go crazy.
5 comments:
What exactly is the difference between being a tireless litigator, and a tiresome one? Put another way, can you imagine Jill Clark's style in the old days, days of manual typewriters and carbon copies where typos had to be corrected on every carbon? Even with modern word processing you have to expect some in that camp are getting carpel tunnel syndrome.
Good Golly John,
Say what....?
Montana
Correct typos on every carbon copy?? What are you talking about?? They don't correct their typos even when there's freaking SPELL CHECK on Microsoft word that provides a cute little red squiggly line under the misspelled word!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Good god that document is a steaming pile of crazy.
At this point I'm pretty versed in reading legal docs, but I'm not sure I can really grasp what she is arguing. IS she really saying that basically the state should be prevented from pursuing those cases because of all the "corruption" she outlines - and because most importantly they are not making allowances for her "disability"
I would imagine if that was a legit gripe, pretty much no guilty person would ever let a case go to trial, they would instead hire a "Disabled" advocate whose condition keeps getting shit delayed.
Cue Ozzie and Randy!
Post a Comment