tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9143409168229764050.post875565751564939742..comments2023-10-09T11:28:14.030-05:00Comments on The Adventures of Johnny Northside: Alleged Gambling House Operating In North Minneapolis, FOX-9 REPORTS, JNS Blog DECIDES To Dig Up More Info...Johnny Northsidehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03694273579383113753noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9143409168229764050.post-4680186835197122682014-11-26T08:22:44.210-06:002014-11-26T08:22:44.210-06:00This post has been corrected in light of further i...This post has been corrected in light of further information. The murder TRIAL took place in 1993, the actual MURDER took place in 1990.<br /><br />The post has been corrected by insertion of the word "trial" in the appropriate sentence. <br /><br />JNS blog strives for accuracy. When error is brought to my attention or I figure out an error has occurred, I leap to make correction. Johnny Northside!https://www.blogger.com/profile/18182711866120550770noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9143409168229764050.post-55857237983851205592014-11-25T21:00:03.451-06:002014-11-25T21:00:03.451-06:00Just don't google Charlie Wilson's War.
&...Just don't google Charlie Wilson's War.<br /><br />"Details of the homicide for which Ware apparently was convicted <br /><br /> http://mn.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.19940809_0011.mn.htm/qx<br /><br />" 08/09/94 STATE MINNESOTA v. CHARLES WARE<br /><br />COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA<br /><br /><br />August 9, 1994<br /><br />STATE OF MINNESOTA, RESPONDENT,<br />v.<br />CHARLES WARE, APPELLANT.<br /><br />Appeal from District Court, Hennepin County; Hon. Daniel H. Mabley, Judge. Dist. Ct. # 90064584<br /><br />Considered and decided by Klaphake, Presiding Judge, Randall, Judge, and Norton, Judge.<br /><br />The opinion of the court was delivered by: Norton<br /><br />NORTON, Judge<br /><br />Appellant was convicted of second degree murder following a trial by jury. The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict. The trial court's exclusion of a photograph showing the lighting conditions from an eyewitness' vantage point did not deny appellant his constitutional right to present a complete defense. Improper statements made by the prosecutor in closing argument are not grounds for reversal here. We affirm.<br /><br />FACTS<br /><br />Appellant was charged with second degree murder following the shooting death of Robert Cole, his wife's nephew, just before 10:47 p.m. on August 26, 1990. See Minn. Stat. § 609.19, subd. 1 (1990). Cole was shot to death in his car at an intersection just down the street from appellant's home. Two neighbors heard the fatal shots and witnessed events which occurred immediately prior to and after the shots." Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com