Photos By John Hoff
Though it seemed like the prosecution was warming up to argue for striking all the testimony of Charlotte Palmer, a rather under-qualified "expert" witness from Atlanta, Georgia, after lunch on Monday prosecutor Brad Johnson had a better plan: turn the defense witness into a prosecution witness...
Starting out with a seemingly-innocuous line of inquiry about what materials the expert witness had reviewed, and making use of his right to know what documents had been in the possession of the so-called "expert," Johnson somehow got his hands on a fat book of material from the defense. At one point the defense attorney made objections, trying to "retrieve the document" and arguing it was "attorney client work product."
Incredibly, Johnson got a document admitted as evidence that had been created by the defense, a kind of chart showing some of the players and their (possible?) roles. Clearly, this was a low moment for the defense. One strongly suspects "inadequate counsel" will be argued on appeal because of moments like this taken along with that whole "insolent, disrespectful, contempt of court, I fine you a hundred bucks" thing.
The jury was clearly paying rapt attention as the expert witness admitted she was now seeing documents which the defense had NOT forwarded to her. Perhaps expecting to be ripped apart by the prosecution, ("magnum" cum laude, cough cough) the witness at first seemed relieved, and then appeared to be actually HAVING FUN as Johnson took her through document after document, some of which clearly bore then name "Larry Maxwell" listed as a "loan officer" for World Link.
(For an explanation about why this fact seems so important, check out some anonymous but incredibly specific comments made to the blog post directly below)
Using the surprisingly friendly and cooperative witness as a beach head to successfully press his attack, Johnson did a lot of damage to the defense. In fact, one of the jurors--"The Dude Who Loves Sports"--clearly seemed amused at Johnson getting his hands on a defense document and then introducing it as evidence, plus eliciting so many friendly, helpful answers from defense expert Palmer, many times over the repeated objections of defense counsel Larry Reed.
Despite Johnson's opportunistic use of the defense witness to get in his own evidence, there were still moments when Palmer's inadequacy as an expert was revealed, such as when she leaned over and asked the judge what she is supposed to do when an objection to her testimony is "sustained."
Finishing up with the witness, asking a few more questions about her background, Johnson managed to confirm Palmer's rather interesting claim to fame: she once did the taxes for "Joe the Plumber." Palmer also asserted every lender doing subprime mortgages has gone out of business. (Is that true? Any reader who can confirm or deny is invited to comment)
At this point in the proceedings, I noticed I was the ONLY spectator in the court room. The law students--logging in 50 hours of courtroom observation for a mentoring class at St. Thomas--were gone. Larry's wife, Vicki Cox-Maxwell, was gone. The small clique of angry-faced men worrying aloud the jury would "hang" Larry Maxwell were gone. It was just me. The prosecutor logs a 95 hour week, dealing with all these tedious documents, and where is everybody?
For that matter, Larry Reed has gone right to the mat for his client--risking reputation and law license--as though this case were somehow more important than most other cases. Something about this case seems to really, deeply matter to Larry Reed at a personal level.
So you have to wonder...what if, one day, somebody just blew the lid right off Twin Cities mortgage fraud--and nobody was there to watch? I'm glad I'm there to watch.
At a point near the end of Palmer's testimony--after Johnson was mostly done with her, and Reed was trying to rehabilitate some of her testimony--something Palmer said elicited the strongest reaction I've seen so far from Larry Maxwell, a man who ordinarily sits calmly, without reacting, without looking at the jury. Palmer discussed an email document which seemed to be addressing Larry Maxwell AS THOUGH HE WERE A LOAN OFFICER. The document talked about a transaction getting delayed because of a snow storm. Palmer said the sender of the email might have been, in effect, trying to keep everybody informed and in the loop because some kind of "customer service issue" had arisen.
There was an angry client wanting to know why the deal had been delayed. That's why you'd send an email like that. To this, Larry Maxwell threw up his hands as though to say, "THERE!!! There you go! Finally, somebody figured THAT out!"
It is unknown whether Palmer's flight back home will be a "midnight plane to Georgia." In any case, the prosecutor wished her a safe trip and Palmer thanked him, smiling broadly. Johnson clearly knows how to catch more flies with honey than with vinegar.
The defense called another witness to the stand, Gregory Jerome Coleman, who had a 12-year career as a punter, including with the Minnesota Vikings. Coleman is a resident of the Hawthorne Neighborhood in North Minneapolis, living at the luxury condos in the "Hawthorne Annex" area near Broadway Pizza, at 2313 Riverpoint Circle. The condos overlook the Mississippi River. He is also a sports commentator and an associate pastor at a church called Living Word, where Larry Maxwell is a parishioner, as well.
Coleman said Maxwell was "widely known in the community" for his real estate sales, and was also running the homeowner's association at the condos for a while, "up until 6 months ago." Maxwell was the "initial president" of the homeowner's association, according to Coleman.
Coleman said Maxwell had "recommended Coleman to a source to get financing." Coleman has known Maxwell for 4 years and had never known him to be a loan officer. Unlike Palmer's testimony, which took all morning and afternoon, Coleman's testimony was brief--rather like a punter's job on the football field.
Brad Johnson cross-examined Coleman, starting out by saying he wished they could have met under other circumstances, and said "When I was 10 years old I had your (football) jersey. Number 8!"
Brad Johnson approached Greg Coleman with the fake ID found in Maxwell's house, but then accidentally dropped the ID. FUMBLE! Oh, but then Johnson picked up the ID and, well, returned it. Larry Reed was not looking forward to questions directed at Coleman about the fake ID found in Maxwell's house, and whether any of this changed Coleman's positive opinion of Maxwell.
A conference was called out of the hearing of the jury, most likely in regard to whether Coleman's testimony was that of a "character witness" and, therefore, whether the fake ID could be brought before the witness to see if Coleman's opinion about Maxwell's character would change. (A similar issue arose with another witness some days ago, which this blog didn't have a chance to report)
These are the moments that get interesting, when the jury is left alone in the room without the lawyers and judge present.
Four of the women jurors in the front row looked over toward "The Dude Who Loves Sports," seated at the end of the jury box just a few feet from Greg Coleman. They realized this must be a great moment for Dude, in a trial he found boring beyond endurance, to have a sports hero on the stand. Dude commented that he'd love to have this guy sign his football. Suddenly, the witness (Coleman) and the juror (Dude) were talking--not about the trial but the fact Greg Coleman had already met the juror. When the juror was a little child, Greg Coleman had signed his SHOE.
"I signed your dirty shoe?" Coleman laughed, shaking his head. These are the things you do when you're a sports star; you sign autographs for kids. If they want you to sign their dirty little shoe, you sign it. You smile, and maybe you genuinely enjoy it, or maybe it's kind of an act, but either way if you can pull this kind of thing off for 12 years you end up in the same place: living in a luxury 3 story condo unit, with an ELEVATOR inside, overlooking the Mississippi River within easy walking distance of Broadway Pizza.
To the mighty Greg Coleman, the Sports Loving Dude revealed he attended Orno High School and played "tight end." They nodded to each other. In their own way, they had both been "Mister Football." Here sat the mighty Greg Coleman, football star, but who had more power in that conversation? The juror. The guy with a swollen foot who had to elevate his leg, who played football in high school and, apparently, never even managed to play at a college level. But it was the "Sports Dude" who had the power to make the play, here, and send Maxwell to prison or, in the alternative, hang the jury single-handedly.
The conversation--though rather odd in a court proceeding--seemed quite innocent, no more than one might have in an elevator or standing, awkwardly, side by side at urinals. And moments like that happen in a court proceeding, all the time. The jury is sequestered and yet they wander the building during lunch, they bump into characters in the trial, and there are moments like this. I've talked to Dude in the elevator, for example. I asked him if his white stocking cap said "UND" or "Notre Dame," since the entwined letters look very similar.
"Notre Dame," he told me, and asked if my computer was an Apple. Yes, it was an Apple. He mentioned he used to have an Apple.
The prosecution either didn't get its way in counsel chambers or decided, given the late hour of the day, bringing up the fake drivers license with this witness just wasn't worth the effort. Send the jury home. Let the judge have her surgery and her day of recovery.
As the jury left, Brad Johnson made it clear they should STAY OFF THE INTERNET and not read the Johnny Northside blog. (OK, my blog wasn't mentioned but somehow I felt like it was STRONGLY IMPLIED) Johnson said the last thing they wanted to do was START ALL OVER AGAIN.
The jurors left, smiling, especially Sports Dude. Two days off and he had chatted with Greg Coleman! If only he'd brought his football, though.
"Counsel," said Judge Chu, in a serious tone, "I need to talk to you."
Outside the hearing of the jury, the judge needed to know if Maxwell would testify, and how many other defense witnesses would testify. Reed said somebody named "Larry Fitzgerald" might be a witness. As for Maxwell, his client is inclined NOT to testify, but he may change his mind on that, though he "probably" won't change his mind on that, but if he does change his mind the prosecution will get notice the day before. (By which I assumed Reed probably meant 11:59 pm)
Reed emphasized that "my client does not have to make a decision until we get to a point of closing."
The judge--who has never revealed exactly why she is having surgery, though removing a painful defense lawyer from her lower back comes to mind--said she would like the defense and prosecution to get a copy of the jury instructions "as they are now," and furthermore would like to accomplish something while at home recovering from surgery. The judge suggested a telephonic conference over the "Blakely proposed instructions."
These Blakely instructions will be used in a few days when the jury finds Maxwell guilty as all-get-out, guilty as charged, guilty as sin, guilty in a way only Jesus can forgive, and then needs to decide whether there were aggravating factors.
Defense Attorney Larry Reed said it is possible they may close on Thursday but Prosecutor Brad Johnson said a Thursday conclusion was contingent on rebuttal witnesses who may be called. And so the trial that has no end continues to march toward May Day but, in the meantime, Larry Maxwell can enjoy one more walk in the spring sunshine near the river, one more hot and cheesy takeout pizza, and the unrestricted companionship of his wife.
I hope the judge has made Maxwell turn over his passport. I really hope that's the case.
Leaving the courtroom, the judge cheerfully promised not to die on the operating table.
In the photos above, the woman walking in the front in the top photo, (obscured by a small tree) is defense witness Palmer. Behind Palmer is Defense Attorney Larry Reed, loaded down with documents. The man in the red tie, directly behind Reed, is the defendant Larry Maxwell.
A random passerby is behind Maxwell. The woman in the far right of the top photo, dressed in aqua, is Maxwell's mother.
In the photo below, a woman who may be Maxwell's daughter, on the right, Larry Reed, center, and Larry Maxwell confer at a tree planter in the public lobby of the Hennepin County Government Center.
A secluded area like this, with some trees, is sometimes known as a "bower."
This post was corrected in regard to the identity of the woman, who I initially believed to be Vicki Cox-Maxwell. It should also be corrected in this regard: if Vicki is in California, then Larry Maxwell would not, in fact, be able to enjoy her companionship even if the trial drags on prior to what I seriously expect will be a prison sentence.
"Palmer also asserted every lender doing subprime mortgages has gone out of business. (Is that true? Any reader who can confirm or deny is invited to comment)"
ReplyDelete------
Not true, although one could argue that the spirit of the statement is directionally accurate. If you really want to see hard data on subprime originations over the last few years I can pull some trade journal number for you.
If not, this gives a fairly simple view:
http://www.nationalmortgagenews.com/freedata/?what=bcor
While there has been a significant (read: nearly complete) pull back from doing subprime originations, you can't technically say that everyone who was doing them "went out of business". Those that relied heavily or exclusively on them did--- including those that invested heavily into them. Others simply stopped doing subprime, but are still in business. Others ended up making acquisitions or being acquired.
The entire industry is on its head since 2007, but everyone did not "go out of business".
I don't think that the woman in the courtroom your refer to as Vicki Cox-Maxwell is really she. Is this the woman with the red shirt on in the picture posted above? This is not Vicki Cox-Maxwell.
ReplyDeleteJNS,
ReplyDeleteJust want to you know, I sent a feedback to the Strib. commenting on this piece of *blank*:
http://www.startribune.com/local/42968197.html?elr=KArksLckD8EQDUoaEyqyP4O:DW3ckUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aUUsZ
In my comment I sent this blog entry, I told them they should file that ROCHELLE OLSON and hire you.
That dude beat me to it. I have nothing to add except that I like the "handle" he/she uses and I'm glad to know there are multiple mortgage geeks out there.
ReplyDeleteThe woman in the red shirt is not Vicki Cox-Maxwell. The woman in the red shirt is Larry Maxwell's eldest child.
ReplyDeleteThing number one: Mortgage Geek, how do you KNOW the other mortgage geek is a female? Be careful and don't let the guifiti do the thinking for you, if you know what I mean.
ReplyDeleteThing number two: I am surprised to learn this person may not be Vicki Cox-Maxwell. You'd think she'd be around the court to support her husband. I am willing to believe what these posters are telling me and have corrected the post accordingly.
The woman in the red is Larry Maxwell's daughter, his eldest child. I know this because I am her sister, another daughter of his.
ReplyDeleteThanks, and please feel free to add another OTHER informative and substantive commentary.
ReplyDeleteWhy is Reed fighting so hard on this one? Why does this case seem so personal to Reed?
Vicki Cox-Maxwell reportedly went to California to declare bankruptcy. I don't know if there were other reasons (such as yet another state with high mortgage fraud...could they have dealings there too?) but it just so happens that CA has a very long, drawn-out bankruptcy process. That's the reason nobody's been able to acquire 409 31st Ave N. There's a federal tax lien on it AND it's winding its way through California bankruptcy courts. Surprise, surprise, Vicki has been pulling every string she can to make that process drag on and on. Maybe Vicki is in CA, avoiding bankruptcy judges and that's why she can't make it to the trial of her hubby.
ReplyDeleteTo the person who keeps feeding me Maxwell/Reed info on the unpublished comments back channel: yes, I am getting your messages and thank you.
ReplyDeleteIt is not true that "every lender doing subprime mortgages has gone out of business". There is a reliable and quality lender right here in North Minneapolis that provides sub prime products. Neighborhood Housing Services (NHS) still provides sub prime products and has an excellent track record of providing mortgages that are fair and sustainable to the borrower. There is a distinction between predatory lenders and sub prime lenders. Palmer is an idiot, a liar or both. I suspect it is both. There are still plenty of predatory lenders out there to so buyer beware (caveat emptor).
ReplyDeleteDaniel Rother
Thanks for the blow by blow coverage.
johnny i can't believe you are withholding juicy info from us on the unpublished backchannel. so not fair, we have been loyal readers.
ReplyDeletewe might raise up and take over this thing here!
People tell me plenty of stuff that's not for publication. They do it ALL THE TIME. This particular source is communicating via "do not publish" comments.
ReplyDeleteWhen and if I can get info out in the open, I'll get it out there as quick as I can.
It's my understanding that Vicki left MN to return to CA to be with her family.
ReplyDeleteQuestion was the fake id found in the Larry's home have Greg Coleman's name on it?
ReplyDeleteNo, the fake ID was in the name of the identity theft victim whose initials are "J.F."
ReplyDeleteFor a blog posting about who the fake J.F. might be, go back a few posts." The name "Kenny Wilson" slipped out in the course of the trial.
The reason Brad Johnson would have wanted to ask Coleman about the fake ID had to do with Coleman as a potential character witness. (Defense would argue Coleman is NOT a character witness but it is, well, highly arguable that he is)
If defense has a character witness on the stand, prosecution might ask that witness something like, "Would it change your opinion to know Larry Maxwell was previously convicted of a felony involving possession of a forged instrument?"
With a CHARACTER witness the prosecution might be allowed to ask that question under SOME circumstances.
johnny northside, you are confusing me with your explanations of character witness, the fake id etc...
ReplyDeletewhat are you trying to say about coleman being a character witness or some other type of witness.
wasn't brad johnson a quarterback for the vikings? so we have a ex-punter and a guy whose name is same as a former QB - and we potentially have a larry fitzgerald witness (He is a vikings sports writer)
what is this, the vikings trial? were there any loveboats involved?
"People tell me plenty of stuff that's not for publication. They do it ALL THE TIME. This particular source is communicating via "do not publish" comments."How does one do this? Do we have to leave one of those notes with words clipped out of the newspaper in a secret drop spot? Hide in the shadows and speak in whispers in some DC parking ramp?
ReplyDeleteThis is a legal proceeding. It's complicated. If Coleman is a character witness, then certain questions might be allowed. If he's NOT a character witness, then those questions might NOT be allowed.
ReplyDeleteDefense doesn't view Coleman as a character witness. But based on the things he said while testifying, one can very easily say, oh yeah, Coleman was a character witness...which is probably how the prosecution views it. No matter. Coleman ultimately wasn't asked about the fake drivers license. That's OK. The jury already knew what was in the envelope.
The fact this guy is a former Viking doesn't matter much. He was testifying about his dealings with Larry Maxwell. Sure, the defense would love to razzle dazzle us with prominent figures--Spike Moss also testified--but these individuals were there to testify based on knowledge of Larry Maxwell.
It was not like "I'm a former Viking, so you should have high regard for what I say."
It sure was a great moment for the juror I call The Dude Who Loves Sports, though!
"Brad Johnson" is a pretty common name. The prosecutor is NOT the former Vikings QB.
ReplyDeleteDaughter here again...Vicki did leave to go back to CA. She is not in MN. She has been there ever since this whole mess started. She does come back when there are legal things with REAPG.
ReplyDeleteJohnny, I appreciate your blog. This is my only update on what is going on and it is helpful. Although it is hurtful to read at times, it is my only way to learn about this trail. Thank you.
I will not give my opinion as to what is happening with my dad (whether I believe it or not or think he is guilty or innocent), but I will say this: you reap what you sow, and if did indeed sow, then he will reap! Only God knows at this point.
To the poster stating she is Larry Maxwell's daughter: you're not the only one telling me my blog posts are the only way interested parties know what is going on with this trial. Thanks for your comments.
ReplyDeleteIn regard to a question asked earlier about how one communicates on the back channel: individuals use the comment function but write something like DO NOT PUBLISH and FOR YOUR EYES ONLY. I get the comment, read it, but I don't hit the "publish" button.
I really do prefer people to write comments for publication, but sometimes people are giving me very specific info that helps me understand things better, and then maybe I know what to look out for as I watch the case.
This case is different than other cases. This case appears to be THE LID. And that seems to be one reason why Larry Reed is putting everything on the line to help Larry Maxwell. Because if Maxwell is convicted, it doesn't end with Maxwell.
I'll say it here and now: the prosecutor's office needs adequate help and resources to pursue all these mortgage fraud cases. This is a good way to help neighborhoods, because city government can gain a degree of control over the fate of the properties, as with the TJ Waconia properties. (Sentencing on THAT is tomorrow)
To the person commenting on the back channel about Rev. McAfee, etc., I think your commentary is very interesting but I don't see why you insist on saying these things only on the back channel. All the same, I'm happy to keep hearing more.
ReplyDelete