post by John Hoff
I reported yesterday that creepy sex offender Peter Rickmyer, who is notorious for filing frivolous lawsuits in both state and federal court, recently filed his umpteenth lawsuit against the Jordan Area Community Council.
Yesterday, I didn't have a copy of the lawsuit but today I do. Click here to view the document, which consists of one page. Seldom has so much legal confusion been packed into so few words...
The document is entitled Order Of Temporary Restraining Order, which is bizarre point of confusion number one. Why would a judge order an order?
The so-called "order" is, in fact, Rickmyer's request and vain, hopeful wish for an order; complete with a handy place for the judge to sign. Apparently Rickmyer hopes that by saying as little as possible the judge will simply sign off on his madness.
Rickmyer makes an incomplete and stillborn argument of sorts with the words "Pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act." However, Rickmyer has no physical disability, other than looking like an elderly and grumpy Chuckie doll. All of his disabilities are cognitive, i.e., he's a pedophile pervert. Having no physical disability which would necessitate, for example, a wheelchair ramp, Rickmyer lacks standing because (ironically) he is able to stand, to walk, and to chase cars like a stray wiener dog.
I don't have any word about how tonight's JACC meeting went, which included Rickmyer on the agenda. However, when I get word I'll pass on the info.
Spanky Pete might be inspired by some notorious local litigators.
ReplyDeleteThere are reports that certain internationally infamous litigators are now filing suits against businesses which have websites allegedly "not accessible to persons who are visually impaired."
Govern yourself accordingly!
I thought he was barred from filing any more suits, or does this not even count as a lawsuit?
ReplyDeleteHe is barred from filing any more suits in Hennepin County without a licensed attorney signing off on the lawsuit. With Jill Clark suspended from the practice of law due to mental health issues, finding an attorney to put their good name on his madness has apparently proven impossible for Spanky Pete.
ReplyDeleteHe's NOT barred from filing suits in federal court, though a ruling on whether he is a frivolous litigant in the local FEDERAL court is expected any day or perhaps any week. JNS blog is named in THAT lawsuit.
So, despite being barred from filing lawsuits, he has found a way to file lawsuits by "forum shopping."
Meanwhile, there is a WARRANT for him in Oklahoma County, Oklahoma which has been active since Kurt Cobain was walking the earth.
Your first two posts are of a black woman and white guy who have been giving our area trouble since they were hatched.
ReplyDeleteThis is an example of what we are up against, black and white garbage and their relatives who are relentless due to mental illness and incest.
Thanks for the clarification, John!
ReplyDeleteI write without regard to color, based upon the content of character. I am an equal opportunity blogger, and every race, color and creed has equal opportunity to be offended, to have their sacred cow gored, to see their mug shot here.
ReplyDeleteWhen people try to defend themselves against being racist, by bringing up race, they just look racist. Please stop!
ReplyDeleteRight. One should just remain quite and accept any false accusations of racism that are leveled. (Sarcasm font)
ReplyDeleteThat's one creepy picture. I think he's looking at the camera out of the corner of his eye.
ReplyDeleteDid it ever occur to you that all the attention you give to Spanky Pete just goes to fuel the perverse sense of self emulation he gets by filing these lawsuits while creating more distress for the targets of his psychotic rampages?
ReplyDeleteDoes that matter to you - or does the act of publicizing it wiggle your tickle so much you don't care about others?
Maybe we have two peas wrapped in the pod of public spectical?
Since it's people INSIDE of JACC who directed me to this information and made the lawsuit available, that truly hadn't occurred to me. I will give much thought to your comment...
ReplyDeleteThere. I'm done giving much thought to your comment.