Showing posts with label 3223 Bryant Ave. N.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 3223 Bryant Ave. N.. Show all posts

Sunday, September 14, 2014

Years Of Court Battles For Mahmood Khan, Owner Of A North Minneapolis Rental Property Empire In Tatters...

Photo by Jeff Skrenes, a/k/a the Hawthorne Hawkman, used previously on a guest
author article here on JNS blog, blog post by John Hoff


Click here for Minnesota Appeals Court document. 

Click here for another appeals court document. 

And click here for yet another. 

And here is one more.  

Click here for the one that started it all in the Court of Appeals. 

Mahmood Khan Is All The Buzz On Facebook 

A little more than a week ago, Fifth Ward City Councilman Blong Yang--our neighborhood's "law and order" representative in Minneapolis city government--published the following on his Facebook page, and his comments were immediately shared on North Vent, the premiere Facebook forum on North Minneapolis neighborhood issues...

Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Read 'Em And Weep: List Of Slumlord Mahmood Khan's Properties, Updated...


Photo image from a Youtube video put together by citizens in North Minneapolis, but the photo of Khan shown above apparently originated with the Star Tribune, blog post by John Hoff



This blog previously published a list of the properties known to be owned by notorious North Minneapolis slumlord Mahmood Khan, click here.

I was recently forwarded a longer list than I had before. It includes a couple properties that aren't in North Minneapolis.

Here is the list...

Tuesday, September 6, 2011

Appeals Court Slaps Slumlord Mahmood Khan...


Blog post by John Hoff

Word reaches me in Afghanistan that slumlord Mahmood Khan, who appealed the revocation of the rental license of his property at 3223 Bryant Ave. N., just got slapped down by the Minnesota State Court of Appeals.

Here is a link to the recent court case.

According to a local lawyer who "cc emailed" me about the matter, a slummy thumby nail summary would be as follows...


Khan claimed the hearing officer was biased because the city hired that person. And the state appeals court said nuh-uh.

I should add that "slummy thumby nail summary" is my phrase. However, "appeals court said nuh-uh" is verbatim from the local attorney.