First Amendment Fair Comment and Criticism,
blog post by John Hoff
A few stories have appeared in the mainstream media which summarized the criminal complaint against Edward "Eddie" Hubbard, accused of murdering Jeremiah Curtis.
For those who would like to read the criminal complaint for themselves, well, click here.
11 comments:
Here is the STrib story, just for completeness of the record.
http://www.startribune.com/local/minneapolis/207390131.html
shot by a jealous faggot ass nigga and there be plenty in north Minneapolis becuz you all be nuttin but freaks cludin yo fake white ass
Johnnynorfside says:
WOW!!! Johnnyboy!!! I can't believe
you posted those RACIST comments 5/16/13/@ 10:19AM That is so messed up on so many levels YOU really should have censored it!!!
"'Cause were really SENSITIVE people" golly gee's your turning into Jerry Springer [sorry Jerry] lately. What's next, Saying police rolled by in a XXXXX and XXXXX, or maybe say there are XXXXX out conditions in a BLIZZARD and last but not least use XXXXX flag to KILL UN-wanted BUGS!!! Oh JOHNNY! raise the XXXXX flag and SURRENDER just like you did before. Oh Yeah! I bet "Jill Clark" WOULD NOT censor her blog?
XOXOXO
Who loves ya baby?
JOHNNYNORFSIDE Dose
"Photo from Facebook tribute page, used under
First Amendment Fair Comment and Criticism,
blog post by John Hoff"
I see that you post this under every photo that you steal from someones social media page. You really need to take a class of copyright law.
You clearly misunderstand what is fair use. While I doubt any of these scum will take the time to file a claim in Federal court, you do so at your own risk. One of these days, you'll screw with the wrong person, and end up in a Federal action you won't win.
Save the snarky retort, and accept the criticism from someone who respects copyright.
Is there a translator service for anony. 10:19?
I have, in fact, taken a class on copyright and other intellectual property. That's why I word those captions the way I do.
It is the policy of this blog to reject overt, in-your-face racist commentary.
It is now my policy to reject overt, in-your-face homophobic commentary.
Homophobic comment rejected.
let's see the comment you rejected. Prove yourself. Why do you censor your blog? Patronizing for what purpose? What is overt? A little bit is okay? What is your point? You afraid you will get accused of... what?
Can we still make fun of Evanstad?
Please?
I still don't understand what anony. 10:19 is trying to say. Is there some form of English I'm missing out on?
Hearing on this alleged murder set for October 15, at 8:45 am.
Post a Comment