Showing posts with label Jerry L. Moore. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jerry L. Moore. Show all posts

Friday, October 18, 2013

While He Continues To Owe Me A Judgment Of $3,799.69, Jerry Moore Lives Large And Posts Pictures Of His Life On Facebook...

Photo from Facebook page of Jerry C. Moore, used under First 
Amendment Fair Comment and Criticism

Somebody in my social circle sent me a link to the Facebook profile of Jerry C. Moore, who appears to be one and the same with Jerry L. Moore. Just like the fraudsters who (along with Jerry) were involved in the mortgage fraud at 1564 Hillside Ave. N., Jerry finds it expedient to make adjustments to his name, in this case a new middle initial.

Jerry Moore sued me for defamation for saying he was "involved" with the mortgage fraud at 1564 Hillside Ave. N, with which he was involved. For a while, I owed Moore a $60,000 judgment. Then the State Court of Appeals reversed and it's Jerry who owes ME, to the tune of $3,799.69. I have been trying to find Jerry, trying to get my money, and I will be turning over internet rocks until I have my money. The latest rock I am looking under is the Facebook profile of Jerry "C" Moore.

That's "C" for "I C you, Jerry Moore."

Oh, and he likes the nickname "J Moe" on Facebook. You would think the former head of a Northside neighborhood association would be reluctant to identify with the nickname "Moe" and all the gang violence associations with "Moe" on the Northside but, well, those of us who knew Jerry well and saw through his smooth veneer always figured Jerry was down with the criminal element.

I can't see Jerry's Facebook profile from my own profile because he has me blocked, however...

Wednesday, October 16, 2013

Fifth Ward Candidate Blong Yang Denies Jerry Moore Is Working For His Campaign And Says Anybody Who Says That Is A Liar...Blong Yang Blogspot Profile Is, However, Unconfirmed...(UPDATE UPDATE UPDATE: Email received from Blong Yang And Info Is Now Confirmed)

Creative stock photo, Blong post (heh heh) by
John Hoff


Posting from a Google profile with the name "Blong Yang," but unconfirmed (ADDENDUM, INFO IS NOW CONFIRMED) to be connected with Fifth Ward Candidate Blong Yang, I have received the following missive:

Johnny Northside, you're a hard person to get a hold of, so here's my response: Your sources are absolutely WRONG on the Jerry Moore connection. I guess they're not very credible. I mean, if you want dirt from my campaign, just come and ask me. Spreading lies and rumors seems to be a common thing, at least from that one campaign. I can guess which one. I don't know Jerry Moore. And, I can flat out say that Jerry Moore has not and will not work for me. Hopefully that's clear.


To which JNS Blog replies: I am glad to hear that, if it's true and if the message does indeed come from you, Mr. Yang. Send me an email. Do you know which campaign, if any, Jerry Moore is working for? Also, I would like your further thoughts on sex offender concentration.

I queried the original source of the "Jerry Moore appears to be working for Brett Buckner" rumor and was told Moore was spotted with a bunch of Brett Buckner workers and...

Saturday, October 12, 2013

Saturday, August 17, 2013

HAS ANYBODY SEEN JERRY LAMONT MOORE? HE OWES ME $3,799.69 FROM THE BLOGOSPHERE TRIAL OF THE CENTURY, PART TWO, BABY MAMA ASSAULT DRAMA OR JUST AN INCREDIBLE NAME COINCIDENCE?

Photo from Desmoinesmugshots.com, used under First Amendment 
Fair Comment and Criticism, blog post by John Hoff

Is this one of Jerry L. Moore's baby mamas or an incredible name coincidence? Read further for MOORE details...

AS I HOPE THAT I MADE ABUNDANTLY CLEAR IN PART ONE, Jerry Lamont Moore owes me $3,799.69 from the Blogosphere Trial of The Century AND I WANT MY MONEY.

Recently, in attempting to determine where Jerry Moore is working following his "triple crown" firing from JACC, from the University of Minnesota, and from Wells Fargo,  AND HOW I CAN RECOVER MY MONEY FORM HIM, I was researching Jerry Moore's baby mamas and...

Thursday, August 15, 2013

Has Anybody Seen Jerry Lamont Moore? He Owes Me $3,799.69 From The Blogosphere Trial Of The Century...(PART ONE OF GOD KNOWS HOW MANY)

Photo from Busted Mug Shots Dot Com, used under First Amendment
Fair Comment and Criticism, blog post by John Hoff

Well, it's been quite a while since I won a judgment of $3,799.69 from Jerry Moore, who sued me but then lost on appeal in a lawsuit over "defamation" which ultimately came down to just one sentence. Click here for the original "defamatory" article, if your definition of "defamatory" (like Jerry's definition) is "truthful."

A regular reader turned up this image and while I don't normally use images from Busted Mug Shots Dot Com, I have to make a teensy weensy exception in this case. I'll also go out of my way to link to their site.

Did I mention that was BUSTED MUG SHOTS DOT COM?

The image, above, comes from an incident in January of 2009 when Jerry was arrested over domestic assault, allegedly, but I am pretty sure no criminal conviction came of it. The BUSTED MUG SHOTS DOT COM website lists the old charge as follows...

Tuesday, February 26, 2013

$60,000 Judgment In Blogospere Trial Of The Century Vacated, This Is What Victory Tastes Like...

Photo, blog post by John Hoff

Months ago, when the Minnesota State Court of Appeals overturned the $60,000 judgment against this blog in Moore v. Hoff, one of my family members threw an impromptu victory party with a jar of caviar and some sparkling apple cider. And though the Court of Appeals made its ruling last summer, the actual and formal administrative action of overturning of the judgment took a little while and happened only yesterday.

So, in a sense, I am $60,000 richer.

It's not entirely clear to me why...

Friday, October 5, 2012

Jerry Moore Owes $3,799.69 After Blogosphere Trial Of The Century, Yes, I Will Be Happy To Take A Check...


Photo taken with my camera by unknown guest at party where I was served with Jerry Moore's lawsuit, blog post by John Hoff

I received word from my attorney today that Jerry Moore, who unsuccessfully sued this blogger in Moore v. Hoff for supposedly defaming him, now owes this blogger almost four grand in costs. Here is a copy of the judgment, which was just emailed to me today, click here.

Trying to collect this money will prove INTERESTING to say the least. But it will certainly give me something to blog about.

It should be added....

Monday, August 20, 2012

Total Vindication in "Blogosphere Trial Of The Century," Here Is Link To The Appeals Court Ruling In Moore v. Hoff...

Creative stock photo, blog post by John Hoff

As announced here on Johnny Northside hours ago, the Minnesota State Court of Appeals has issued a ruling which is a complete and total vindication of this blog in the "Blogosphere Trial of the Century." There will be no new trial and, furthermore, this is a published case so it will be precedent.

For those who want to read the actual court opinion, here is a link, click here.

A great deal of mainstream media coverage is expected. Watch for...

Tuesday, May 29, 2012

PART FIVE, Jerry Moore vs. John Hoff a/k/a Johnny Northside Case Argued Before Minnesota State Court Of Appeals, Meanwhile "Third Amended" Lawsuit Names Moore And Describes His Alleged $5,000 "Kickback" For Introducing Felon Larry Maxwell To Slumlord Keith Reitman, Resulting In The Fraudulent Deal At 1564 Hillside Ave. N.

Jerry Moore, on right, at a 2008 event reaching out to North Minneapolis residents with problem mortgages, blog post by John Hoff

This blog post primarily concerns the allegations "in story form" contained in Melony Michaels' and John Foster's "Third Amended Complaint," a lawsuit filed against various individuals and businesses in the wake of the mortgage fraud at 1564 Hillside Ave. N., which sent Larry "Maximum" Maxwell to prison. 

Part One, "moore than meets the eye" with former JACC executive director Jerry Moore, click here. 

Part Two, a tale of two court trials, Moore has a foot planted in both, click here.

Part Three, a strange bounce of the legal ping-pong ball makes Moore a defendant, once again, in the civil suit, click here...and this after the crazy Mpls Mirror lady crowed about him being dropped. "Silence is deafening" from Moore's critics, Moore "vindicated," blah blah blah.

Part Four, the "cast of characters" in the lawsuit, including Jerry Moore, click here.

In this, Part Five, these characters will fall into place and act out their little drama of fraud, as outlined in the allegations of the "Third Time's The Charm" Amended Complaint...

Sunday, May 27, 2012

PART FOUR, Jerry Moore vs. John Hoff a/k/a Johnny Northside Case Argued Before Minnesota State Court Of Appeals, Meanwhile "Third Amended" Lawsuit Names Moore And Describes His Purported Key Role In The Mortgage Fraud At 1564 Hillside Ave. N.

Photo by John Hoff, Jerry Moore (in the middle) at a mortgage outreach event, blogger and Hawthorne Housing Director Jeff Skrenes is on the right, blog post by John Hoff

This blog post is primarily about the specific contents of the "Third Amended Complaint" in the civil suit filed by John Foster and his wife Melony Michaels over the theft of Foster's identity to commit mortgage fraud at 1564 Hillside Ave. N. and another property, even more specifically the "cast of characters" in the lawsuit.

There is a considerable backstory leading to the Third Amended Complaint.

Part One, learning there's moore than meets the eye with Jerry Moore.

Part Two, a tale of two court trials. 

Part Three, a strange bounce of the legal ping-pong ball, Moore's in the civil suit, no wait he's out, no wait he's back in again.

This brings us to the specific contents of the Third Amended Complaint.

Crack Open Your Lawyers Professional Responsibility Books, Students

The first thing I notice about the "Third Amended Complaint" is one name has dropped off the list of defendants. Slumlord Keith Reitman is not named on the revised list of defendants in the Third Amended Complaint. This sends me racing to the MNCIS online court records to look up the case and discover...

PART THREE, Jerry Moore vs. John Hoff a/k/a Johnny Northside Case Argued Before Minnesota State Court Of Appeals, Meanwhile "Third Amended" Lawsuit Names Moore And Describes His Purported Key Role In The Mortgage Fraud At 1564 Hillside Ave. N.

Photo, (taken circa 2008 at "mortgage outreach" event Moore helped organize) blog post by John Hoff

This post primarily concerns the "strange bounce of the legal ping-pong ball" which made Jerry Moore a defendant, once again, in the civil suit filed over the mortgage fraud at 1564 Hillside Ave. N.

Meanwhile, I am appealing a judgment in a defamation lawsuit which involves writing stuff about Moore being "involved" in the mortgage fraud at 1564 Hillside Ave. N., shortly before he lost a job at the University of Minnesota where he (stomp stomp) researched stuff involving MORTGAGES.

Click here for Part One, a neighborhood in turmoil, Moore at the center of the storm.

Click here for Part Two, a tale of two trials deeply rooted in North Minneapolis issues.

So, to continue: Melony Michaels and John Foster, who were the identity theft victims of Larry Maxwell's "imposter Foster," (a crackhead named Kingrussel) filed a lawsuit against a host of individuals and business alleged to be liable for the damages they suffered from having a lifetime of carefully-managed credit torpedoed like the Lusitania.

But the first lawyer they hired (through a prepaid legal plan) did a terrible job...

Friday, May 25, 2012

PART TWO, Jerry Moore vs. John Hoff a/k/a Johnny Northside Case Argued Before Minnesota State Court Of Appeals, Meanwhile The Ink Is Barely Dry On A Revised Lawsuit Naming Moore As Defendant, And Alleging Participation In The Mortgage Fraud At 1564 Hillside Ave. N.

Photo and blog post by John Hoff

For the back story on 1564 Hillside Ave. N., which led to identity theft victims Melony Michaels and John Foster filing a lawsuit against individuals allegedly involved in the fraudulent mortgage at 1564 Hillside Ave. N., click here for PART ONE.

Nope, Not Involved With That

It was the spring of 2009, and two important trials took place. One was the criminal trial which sent Larry Maxwell to prison. That trial was "wrapping up" in early April. In mid-to-late May of that same spring, the "True JACC" trial took place as rival factions fought over who was the legitimate leadership of the neighborhood organization. (Kip Browne's "New Majority" group, as it turned out, and the game wasn't even CLOSE)

There was a link between the two trials...

Wednesday, April 11, 2012

"True JACC" Civil Case Heard Before Minnesota Court Of Appeals, Source Describes A Hard-To-Watch "Legal Enema" As Jill Clark Hammered By Tough Questions From The Bench...

Stock photo, image from Forward Operating Base Sharana, Afghanistan, blog post by John Hoff

Yesterday, the same day word went far and wide that Jill Clark had lost both of the rancid and hopeless "Spanky Pete" court cases, (click here for that story) Clark was also in front of a three judge panel of the Minnesota Court of Appeals. The case concerns what has become known as the "True JACC" controversy...


...in which newly elected members of the Jordan Area Community Council (JACC) board of directors wrestled control away from a clique of individuals who had allowed mismanagement and fiscal irresponsibility to ride roughshod over the organization. (The case, if you want to look it up, is Ethylon B. Brown, et al v. John Hubbard, et al, 27-CV-09-2277)

Because the JACC board split into factions and some aspects of the election were disputed, with two groups proclaiming themselves the "true" executive officers of the board, the controversy came to be known as the "True JACC" dispute.

Naturally, flakey Golden Valley attorney Jill Clark threw in with the losers, malcontents and bad actors as their attorney. This resulted in a decisive and overwhelming loss in district court. In fact, the losing plaintiffs were assessed attorney fees.

Naturally, Clark appealed. At one point, as I previously reported, she whined about being ill and asked for an extension to file something. My source tells me that despite being granted an extension in response to her whining and (my gut tells me) 200 proof pure malingering, not everything expected to be filed was actually filed.

But at least Clark showed up in court yesterday. Given her recent flakey trend of "attorney unavailable," I wouldn't have bet my paycheck on it. Clark was dressed all in black like a badly aging lounge singer. She had a very small and pathetic entourage.

Terry Yzaguirre, the force behind the Mpls Mirror blog whose extensive and bizarre legal troubles are in the hands of Jill Clark, was seen out in the hallway but reportedly didn't enter the room to watch the hearing. Clark's cheering section inside the court room reportedly consisted of her client, Level Three Sex Offender Peter "Spanky Pete" Rickmyer.

Just as the hearing was about to begin, some legal papers were handed to the defense side: court orders in one of the two "Spanky Pete" cases decided April 5. Spanky had lost.

And, also, as fate would have it--Spanky had lost in the OTHER case, too.

It was a good omen for the defense. Having already won the JACC case overwhelmingly in the district court, they simply needed to hold their ground. It was Clark who needed a miracle, but there was no sign of God in her corner...only the Level Three Sex Offender who had just lost two court cases where Clark was representing him. If there were a musical sound track for this court proceeding, it would the Titanic theme.

My source says Clark looked "rattled and crazy" as she stood to speak with "pages of handwritten notes." The judicial panel started out with three female judges but then, incredibly, a judge named Kevin G. Ross (click for his profile) tapped one of the female judges on the shoulder and the judges "switched out." My source tells me it was Judge Bjorkman who was replaced by Judge Ross. Judge Halbrooks was presiding and Judge Worke was also on the panel, but Ross was the one asking all the pointed questions.

Ross seemed extremely familiar with the case and began "hammering" Clark. My source described it as "a painful legal enema" and said it was "hard to watch." The other two judges said nothing as Ross took the lead.

Clark started out by saying the court should use its "equitable powers" to reinstate the ousted JACC officers. "Equity," for those who only think it's the portion of your mortgaged home you actually own, means powers inherent in the court to decide things based on what seems "fair" and not just case law or statutes. Equitable powers are something of a relic but raise their head every so often in lawyerly arguments. Generally, when you're arguing "equity" it's a sign you don't have either the law or facts on your side, but you desperately hope your cause (or your client's cause) seems "right" or "just" at some emotional level and the court will throw you a bone.

However, Clark's mangy dog of a case didn't seem to be getting any equitable bones. The court asked pointedly about why the court should use "equitable powers" when the ousted executive board members had the option (which they did not exercise) of running for election.

"YES OR NO," asked Judge Ross, trying to nail Clark's legal jello to the wall. "Did they run for subsequent election?"

"No," Jill answered. It was the perception of my source that Clark "backed away" from her argument about equitable powers when Judge Ross seemed unreceptive.

There was next a discussion about "derivative claims," i.e., the ability of a board member to sue ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD and whether you can somehow bring these rights along with you when you're no longer on the board. Some great quotes that came out of this arcane discussion:

Judge Ross: Are you disputing that there is a holding?" (by the district court)

Clark: I'm not disputing that, it says what it says.

And, also, at one point Jill insisted the district court did not consider "the factual facts."

Where is the law? Judge Ross kept asking. Where is the equitable remedy? What was the equitable remedy that the district court was compelled to order given the undisputed facts?

"I don't have it in front of me," Clark admitted.

Poor Clark. In legal water so high above her head. Imagine a lawyer being asked by a judge to cite to the applicable law! The whole time this legal spanking is taking place, who is watching but Spanky Pete? What's going through his mind? I wonder. And also I wonder, well, do I actually want to know? This may be the reason "factual facts" are avoided in the first place. They are too much to endure.

According to my source, the next questions were along the lines of, "Okay, let's say there was anything illegal or improper by the new executive board. Point me to the statute that says you've got any remedy. What is your remedy?" My source estimates "two thirds" of Clark's allotted time was taken up by questions about "what is your remedy" and that Clark kept ineffectually trying to dodge, duck, dip, and dodge.

At some point the Honorable Judge Ross turned to the issue of Executive Director Jerry Moore's contract. Moore--as many Johnny Northside readers are aware--was fired by the newly elected JACC board after he PUNCHED A BOARD MEMBER IN THE FACE during the previous night's board election. Scrutinizing the language of the contract--which this blog and others have always described as a "purported" contract and some strongly suspect it to be ex post facto in its origins, but what did it matter? It still had a "malfeasance" clause--Ross "called out" the language of the contract as "not typical" of contract language.

In regard to Moore getting fired, the only remedy in the (purported) contract seemed to be Moore had a right to know why he was being fired. Whether this meant nitty gritty specifics or a just a general idea didn't seem to be spelled out very well, but what did it matter? There wasn't talk of severance pay and, furthermore, there was a malfeasance clause! If you do something bad (like punch a board member in the face) you can be fired.

Ross asked Clark about a "hypothetical" situation with the contract. Let us say somebody PUNCHES A MEMBER OF THE ORGANIZATION IN THE FACE.

Would THAT be malfeasance? Hmmmmm?

Clark made some weak comment about how "it might be self defense." At some point Clark said, "I can't accept the hypothetical." Ross reportedly looked around at the other judges like, "What on earth? I'm asking the question and she won't answer it? When does THAT ever happen in Appeals Court?"

It was the defense attorney's turn. Diane (last name unknown) an attorney for Briggs and Morgan, stood before the court and summarized all the hearings--dear god, the many many hearings, all the precious human time and effort Clark and her reprobate clients had burned up just to vent the bile from their livers over losing power in the neighborhood election. (I'm paraphrasing, here) (A lot)

It was time for Clark's rebuttal and Judge Ross once again pushed for Clark to cite something specific that gave her a remedy. Clark kept trying to pull a fast one and mention how she'd been an employment law attorney for oh-so-many years.

C'est moi! I AM THE LAW.

The hearing was over, but there was still a little bit of entertainment value left in this cartoon network special. Near the end of the proceedings, sex offender Peter "Spanky Pete" Rickmyer could be heard trying to chat up the security guard. "How you doing? How are things going?" That kind of thing. The guard did his best to ignore The Spankinator.

Trying his best to act a gallant gentleman, Spanky Pete ran to hold the courtroom door for Jill Clark, and ended up becoming a doorman for Diane the defense attorney, David Schooler (also for the defense) and defendant Michael "Kip" Browne.

Then, in a sad little epilogue to the proceeding, Pete realized he'd forgotten his white hat and had to run back inside, awkwardly.

My source tells me Spanky Pete and Jill Clark were spotted the next day (today) at Eddington's Soup and Salad near the Hennepin County Government Center, dining together, no doubt plotting their next move like insane inmates plotting to take over the asylum.

Friday, November 11, 2011

Mug Shot For Tynessia Snoddy, a/k/a Tynessia Thompson, Northside Mortgage Fraudster...


DOC mug shot, therefore public domain, blog post by John Hoff

Tynessia Snoddy, who is in prison under the name Tynessia Nicole Thompson, was involved in infamous mortgage fraud incident at 1564 Hillside Ave. N. (So, for that matter, was former JACC executive director Jerry Moore, but you don't see him cooling his heels in prison like Tynessia. Well, life ain't fair. Just ask Tynessia Snoddy)

Tynessia, who is incarcerated at the women's prison in Shakopee, Minnesota, is looking forward to supervised release on May 9, 2013. She will be supervised for a year after that.

I watched for this mug shot a long time, but I was always using "Tynessia Snoddy" as a search term on the Minnesota DOC website.

One day I got lazy and just typed in "Tynessia" and, well, there it was.

(Do Not Click "Read More")

Thursday, November 10, 2011

Damn Right We're Appealing--And The Appeal Has Been Filed!

Photo by a comrade-in-arms, blog post by John Hoff

God bless America, God bless the First Amendment, but may God ESPECIALLY bless my attorney Paul Godfread who--according to emails that reached me here in Afghanistan--filed an appeal in the Johnny Northside "To Tell The Truth" non-defamation court case. The case has been the subject of commentary all over the nation and, indeed, even in England.

Even though Paul Godfread did the lion's share of the work, I'm told there were others who assisted him. Sooner or later, they will all get a personal thank you. In the meantime I just have to...

...keep my helmet on when I'm pulling sentry duty, and keep my head in the game. The game is not back home in the courts, the game is right here in Afghanistan.

In the photo, above, I'm holding a small town newspaper mailed to me in a care package from one of my relatives. The little structure over my right shoulder (viewer's left) is a bunker meant to protect from "indirect fire" like mortars. The little huts are called "beehive huts" and are living units for soldiers made of plywood, metal, and waterproofing spray foam. Each soldier has about as much living space as the average American bathroom.

One of the "qalat" towers is visible. A qalat is a traditional Afghan fortress made of sun baked mud, straw and (rumor has it) animal dung as the secret ingredient. Of course, calling it a "fortress" doesn't completely translate.

Almost ALL Afghan dwellings are built inside these "qalat" fortress compounds. Their society has known endless warfare since before Alexander the Great, and their building methods reflect that.

God bless America.


Friday, September 2, 2011

Why The Free Speech Issues Matter In Jerry Moore v. John Hoff, a/k/a Johnny Northside (The Daycare Center Example)

Stock photo, blog post by John Hoff


Once upon a time, in a hypothetical neighborhood far, far away, there lived a blogger named Jenny West Shore...


Of course, "Jenny West Shore" wasn't her real name. Her real name was Jennifer Goff. She didn't care to be called "Jenny," but she knew everybody was going to call her "Jenny" anyway. So Jenny decided to embrace her nickname when she moved to the West Shore of Anywhere City and started a blog, "The Journeys Of Jenny West Shore."

Jenny's messy but creative and interesting life had brought her to the West Shore so she could be near her son, who lived with Jenny's ex-husband on an affluent island accessible by ferry. She bought a 100-year-old fixer upper that had been damaged in Hurricane Katrina, joined her neighborhood association the day she bought the house, and proceeded to pour years of journalistic and creative writing experience into her blog which, in no time at all, was something of a sensation. The "Shores Region Weekly" named it best coastal blog two years running.

Some of the issues Jenny tackled included unscrupulous developers who allegedly paid off city officials so they could build near unstable sea shores, grassroots efforts to clean up beach litter and protect seabird nesting areas, and unsafe, unlicensed daycare facilities used by the working class people who labored in the shining resorts and casinos of Anytown.

Jenny also covered very small stories, such as ornamental cast iron manhole covers, an edible seaweed harvesting collective organized by vegetarian lesbians, and efforts by a colorful local character to find a long-lost Spanish fort. Jenny's blog was so hot that it spawned anti-Jenny blogs, who wrote about how Jenny was an unfit mother and how she was part of a trend of working class people who were ruining the once-affluent coastal neighborhoods in light of demographic changes caused by Hurricane Katrina.

Jenny had a law degree though, incredibly, had put off taking a bar exam to deal with family and financial issues. But licensed attorney or not, Jenny was fascinated by legal cases. She wrote dozens of blog stories about the high profile Leonard Trackwell case, which involved child molestation at an unlicensed daycare center. Trackwell went to prison for 20 years for shocking sex crimes committed at the daycare center. Though the case received attention in the mainstream press, Jenny's blog stories contained more color, more detail, more facts than any other media outlet, with PDF links to court documents. Jenny knew well the various characters involved in the Trackwell case.

One of those characters was, incredibly, the former executive director of a local neighborhood association, Gary Less.

Gary had been been fired after a physical altercation with a board member on the night of a board election, but there was a long list of other scandal associated with Less. Some of the scandal involved being associated with the Trackwell criminal case.

Less had been issued a subpoena in the Trackwell matter but, somehow, was never brought in for questioning. He was named in the long, involved criminal complaint against Trackwell as somebody who helped Trackwell obtain ownership of the daycare facility though dubious layers of false identities. This criminal complaint had caused quite a stir in the neighborhood association when Gary Less was named in the document.

Jenny West Shore knew Gary and his shenanigans all-too-well. When Jenny was first looking for a home in Anytown, it was Gary Less who encouraged her to move to his neighborhood and enlightened her about many aspects of neighborhood politics. Though Jenny didn't move into Gary's part of the West Shore, at first she found Gary quite intelligent and charming, and even wrote some complimentary blog articles about him.

Then Jenny found out about Gary's three baby mamas (all sorely underpaid when it came to child support) and Gary's odd, creepy connections with Trackwell. When Gary punched the neighborhood board member in the face on the night of a board election, Jenny started blogging about the resulting scandal.

So after Gary got fired from his highly-paid executive director position, everybody kind of wondered where he would end up.

One day Jenny's cell phone rang. It was another blogger, Don "Beach Comber" Stalin, a local character who resided in a van powered by vegetable oil and tried to live without ever touching money, which he regarded as the root of all evil. Don was often on his own strange trip and was regarded as something of a nutcase, but knew how to put content on the internet (following his own odd grammar rules, like never using capital letters) and somehow managed to insinuate himself into all kinds of West Shore issues even though he parked his van on "the island" and rode the ferry to Anytown.

People who didn't like Don would say, "You live on the freaking island, not West Shores. So why don't you write about the freaking island?"

The answer was, of course, "Because if I wrote about the island, they would deport me by revoking my ferry pass and I dig hanging out with all those rich island people, who need me to score weed for them, though they pay me with gourmet meals because money is the root of all evil."

Don Stalin hated Gary Less, an enmity that went back to the time when Less and Stalin served together on the Shores Marketing Task Force funded by post-Katrina federal grants and Less kept trying to earmark funds for Stalin's blogging efforts, which Stalin wanted to be free, not encumbered by coarse fiscal commerce.

"You're not going to believe where Gary Less is working," Stalin said. Before Jenny could venture a guess, Stalin blurted out, "Shores College Outreach Research Enterprise."

"He's at SCORE?" Jenny asked. The West Shores neighborhood was excited about SCORE and all the good things SCORE wanted to do for the neighborhood, but often found the academics who worked at SCORE disconnected from reality.

"Yes, Less got a research job there," Stalin said. "You'll never guess what he's researching."

"Enlighten me," Jenny begged, grabbing for a pen and scratch paper.

"It's his job to interview little children about their daycare experiences," Stalin said.

Jenny felt chills go down her spine. Gary Less, who had been associated with Trackwell in the child molestation case. Talking to little children about daycare. Without realizing what she was doing, she snapped her pen in half. Ink ran from her fist like blue blood.

"Jesus Christ," Jenny whispered.

"We have to do something about this!" Stalin said. "You have to write something!"

"Why don't YOU write something?" Jenny asked.

"I've already got, like, three money judgments against me for sharing music files on the internet openly and in my own name," Stalin asnswered. "You've heard of the Johnny Northside case in Minnesota, right? Well, I'm scared that if I write something on my blog and Less gets fired, he'll sue me."

"Oh, so you want ME to get sued?" Jenny laughed acidly, now noticing what she'd done to the pen.

"I don't want ANYBODY to get sued but somebody needs to write something about this," Stalin pleaded.

"Why don't you contact KSHR?" Jenny asked, naming the local television station.

"They won't touch it," Stalin answered. "They mentioned the Johnny Northside case. I didn't know what it was. I had to look it up. You already knew about that case, huh?"

"Why the hell do you think I sold my old engagement ring to buy insurance for my blog?" Jenny asked. "Do you know how many stories I've AVOIDED since I heard about that case? Hell, there's a guy managing a Chicken Shack down by the old lighthouse who is a registered sex offender from Minnesota. I've let that story alone because of the Johnny Northside case. Hey, what about the Shores Region Weekly?"

"Won't touch it," Stalin answered. "Cited Johnny Northside."

"Daily Nautilus?" Jenny asked, knowing the answer.

"They told me they wouldn't even allow me to publish a link to MY blog in any of their comment threads if I wrote about it," Stalin answered. "And threatened me with legal action if I tried to post links."

"What if you just quietly and anonymously call a few people at the University?" Jenny asked.

"I already have," Stalin answered. "But he's still working there."

"I can't touch this story, Stalin," Jenny said.

"Yeah," Stalin sighed. "I kind of figured that, but you were my last shot."

There was a long, awkward silence.

"Guess what I found beach combing the other day?" Stalin asked, finally. Without waiting for Jenny to answer, he blurted out, "A whale skull. Completely intact. Not even stinky. I'm going to donate it to science."

"That's cool, Stalin," Jenny said, looking around for a towel or something to wipe the ink off her hand, and discovering that beneath the ink, her hand was bleeding. "I mean, it's cool how you manage to live without money like you do. Hey, keep me posted on this Gary Less situation. I want to know what happens, even if I can't write about it."

So nobody wrote anything on the internet. And the issue, which was never hot anyway because it wasn't public, cooled down.

Then, a few years later, Gary Less drowned when the island ferry hit an old World War Two-era floating mine, and in his private video collection authorities found dozens of tapes of working class children being molested during University-funded interviews about daycare.

Both Jenny West Shore and Don "Beach Comber" Stalin tried to make up for lost time by blogging the "back story" on the recently deceased Gary Less, but they never quite felt right about how they'd remained silent. On the palm of her right hand, Jenny found she had a permanent tattoo where the ink had soaked into the wound where she'd cut herself on the broken pen.

Jenny told herself it was a Nazi tattoo mark from a time when she lived in a country without free speech, before the Johnny Northside case was resolved in favor of the defendant.

Tens of thousands of times, all over the nation, variations on the same basic story were acted out. Bloggers were afraid to blog the truth. Newspapers were afraid to write the truth. Speakers were afraid to speak the truth. What if somebody got fired and filed a lawsuit?

But there was, ultimately, a happy ending.

When the final court finally ruled on Moore v. Hoff, the case was a triumph for free speech.

Bloggers found they didn't have LESS rights to free speech.

They had Moore.

Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Star Tribune Article Is Online About Johnny Northside "Truth And Consequences" Court Ruling...

Photo by Megan Goodmundson, blog post by John Hoff


Within several hours after being notified about the recent court ruling in the Jerry Moore v. John Hoff court battle, the Star Tribune had an article online.

Here is a link to the article.

My favorite part is how it casually mentions Moore's involvement in mortgage fraud. After all, Moore sued me for defamation for saying he was involved in the mortgage fraud at 1564 Hillside Ave. N.

Now every single article pointedly mentions his involvement.

This case and the issues surrounding the mortgage fraud at 1564 Hillside Ave. N. continues to snowball into the FREE SPEECH COURT BATTLE OF THE CENTURY.


(Click here for musical homage)


(Do Not Click "Read More")

Monday, August 29, 2011

JNS BLOG EXCLUSIVE: Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law DENIED In Jerry Moore v. John Hoff a/k/a Johnny Northside "To Tell The Truth" Lawsuit...

Stock photo, blog post by John Hoff

Word reaches me during R&R leave from Afghanistan that my Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law in the Jerry Moore v. John Hoff a/k/a Johnny Northside "to tell the truth" lawsuit has been DENIED.

I am in contact with my attorney, Paul Godfread, about this.

We will appeal.

(Do Not Click "Read More")

Thursday, March 24, 2011

"Old Majority" Legal Party Is Over--Now Comes The Big Bar Tab!

Stock photo, JACC press conference, January 2009, blog post by John Hoff

More than any other media entity, this blog reported the "Old versus New Majority" conflict in the Jordan Neighborhood, which flared up on January 12, 2009 with a fistfight after a new board election...

...leading directly to the firing of their executive director, Jerry L. Moore, and then a protracted court battle. The "Old Majority" interests in Jordan were represented by Attorney Jill Clark. Who else?

In the strictest sense, the court battle is not over. But it's kind of over. The only matter being appealed at this point would be the cost of the legal fees and who has to pay. That matter was taken under advisement by the Honorable Judge Charles Porter about a month ago. Porter still has 60 days, approximately, before he must issue a ruling.

At this point, folks involved in the Jordan Area Community Council (as well as folks who were more intensely involved a couple years ago, during the conflict) are wondering if some kind of six-figure judgment will get slapped on the plaintiffs? In another recent court battle--the Dave Bicking, et al v. Donald Bellfield, et al matter--Jill Clark's clients were socked with a judgment for legal fees. So Jordanites are wondering...

Will the same thing happen in the Old versus New Majority lawsuit?