Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Two More (Expletive) Level Three Sex Offenders Being Dumped In North Minneapolis--WTF DOC?! WTF!!! JNS Blog Has Their Likely Street Address!


Antwon Spells, above, Roosevelt Whittler, below
DOC mug shots are public domain, blog posts by John Hoff


Members of the Minneapolis Police Department are hosting a meeting tomorrow, Thursday March 31, 7 PM to 8:30 PM at St. Olaf Lutheran Church, 2901 Emerson Ave. N.

The subject will be two more Level Three sex offenders being dumped into North Minneapolis as though there is no limit to the number of L3SOs our neighborhood can supposedly accommodate. Meanwhile, there was word from the 5th Ward City Council Member during a "Dessert With Don" meeting that Hennepin County has made some kind of back room deal with other counties to take their...

...Level Three sex offenders. What does North Minneapolis get out of the deal? As far as we can tell, we don't even get our potholes filled near the Holiday Station on Washington Ave. N.

The two dangerous sexual predators in question are Antwon Delaton Spells, who raped an adult female and has an "extensive criminal history," and Roosevelt Whittler, who made the news last year when he pled guilty in a decade old rape case after new DNA testing linked him to the crime. He was reportedly sentenced to four years in prison for a DIFFERENT crime. Gee, four years have not gone by. He's not in prison. He's in North Minneapolis.

A check of the DOC Level Three sex offender website shows these two losers as already being in North Minneapolis, residing on the 3000 block of Emerson Ave. N. It's no difficult leap of logic to realize this is the "rapist village" discovered by Irving Inquisition blog in the duplex at 3008 and 3010 Emerson Ave. N.

My thanks goes to Irving Inquisition blog for boldly exploring the terra incognito of Emerson Ave. N. and discovering the rapist village. Now every time DOC dumps a sex offender on the 3000 block of Emerson Ave. N., we can narrow the location down to the rapist village.

13 comments:

boathead said...

It looked like you were having a pretty good time dodging foxholes on that obstacle course they call a street the other night on news. Our last governor can be thanked for that but he is too busy digging up tha ass of all of his guests at their daily TEA PARTY. Blame can be fixed on him also since the radicalistic placing of fucking rapists and chomoes in North Minneapolis increased ten-fold on his fucked up watch. I read somewhere, i forgot where, that a meeting took place in the Armatage area when they tried to place an offender in their midst and the offender was promptly banished.Where DID he go,la-de-da,(i'm singing now)...off to the desolate North slope on the slippery side of town. When does the one sided shit cease?!? How come the city of Minneapolis and the state of Minnesota continue to let this happen on such a blatant, biased, and do you mind if i shit in your mouth again approach? Got any hot sauce? I like my shit wit' hot sauce. Later.

Anonymous said...

Hey boathead, I think I like your post, but for God's sake, learn the English language. Your grammar is atrocious and your spelling isn't much better. Sorry.

HC said...

Damn!

Johnny Northside! said...

If any lawyer will represent me pro bono on this matter, I will be happy to file a lawsuit on behalf of my beleaguered neighborhood against the DOC, slumlords, or any other defendant. I can find about a dozen similarly situated neighbors who would happily join as co-plaintiffs.

This is a direct solicitation to ANY LICENSED LAWYER. We are defenseless and oppressed.

Help. Help. Help.

Anonymous said...

John,

If you really want to sue these people you can file pro se. You have a law degree use it. You might also want to research standing before you get too involved.

There is no cause of action created by the sex offender concentration statute, so you would just be wasting your time.

You can't sue the city or the DOT because of potholes because of sovereign immunity.

You may be able to sue a slumlord if they do something to you specifically, but you can't sue them for being assholes, at least not successfully.

Good luck though. Let me know if you have other ideas. Some of these slumlords are assholes and the govt is crooked, so if you have any ideas about suing them I'd be happy to hear them.

Anonymous said...

Perhaps you need to go back to law school and re-learn the basics.

This was a little poem from one of my law books:
"The common-law rule from the old days of Kent,
You cannot sue the King without his consent.
Is still existence this very day
To prevent the poor plaintiff from having his say.
The United States is today the King,
And, though Congress by statute some help did bring,
The result is the same as in the days of old –
The plaintiff, generally, is out in the cold."

You can't sue the state in state court. The state has sovereign immunity.
Besides, there is no cause of action. The DOC does not place sex offenders. Offenders must find their own housing. Those no longer under supervision can live where ever they choose. And the rule for those that are under supervision states that the local corrections department must try to not clump them in the same neighborhood if "feasible". The key word is feasible. There is nothing that states they cannot place sex offenders close to each other, it just says they have to try to not place them together if feasible.
So if it's not feasible, they don't have to comply.
Again, just to make it clear, there is no mandatory requirement that level 3 sex offenders be equitably distributed.
Even Linda Higgins stated there is nothing that can be done about it because of the way the statute is worded.
Further, if it was some sort of a crime, don't you thing the County Attorney would do something about it?

And, if you think you have the basis to file suit against the State, go for it. But no attorney who values his/her reputation would file such a frivolous action against the government.

boathead said...

Grammar? Did you attend the Julliard school of proper grammar? I am posting, as i always do,in my -get this now- lifelong North Minneapolis accent and this is how it looks for those of you who may have never figured the shit out. My spelling is fine as i looked at my last post so i am confused that i keep getting called out on my said topic. I spell chomoes with an E on the end just like you would with tomatoes. I would like to know what the fuck is spelled wrong in the post you are commenting on, Dan Quayle. That might be little over your head, sorry. Got Milk? I like my milk WIT' hot sauce.Hayzoos, mio dios! I am over it now. Thank you for thanking me. Good Day.P.S. I am hoping, like all get out, that a lawyer takes you up on your proposition, John. Keep up the great work. You are relentless, man! WHOOO! Ric Flair!

Johnny Northside! said...

To the Legal Eagle:

What do you think about an INJUNCTION instead of a tort lawsuit?

NoMi Passenger said...

To the Legal Eagle:

Two words:

Hollman Decree.

Concentrating poverty.

The city, the state and the federal government lost.

A lawsuit against the DOC, or the County or whoever may not be a slam dunk win, but it sure as heck will make some important people sit up and take notice. It will have an impact no doubt.

Anonymous said...

No grounds for an injunction. But good luck.
It appears you just want publicity. And you have found a topic to get it.

Anonymous said...

Wow Nomi Passenger knows two words. Very impressive. However if you were onto something you would be DOING SOMETHING vs just agitating. The system is doing fine as is, these people are basically sentenced to NOMI.

boathead said...

Anonameass 6:32 believes you guys and gals are just agitating? Did Rumpelstilskin just awaken from a long sleep and decide to post while shaking the bats out of his belfry? I guess rumpel did not wake up in time to catch last nights news,or did not watch the channel you guys were on..that part i can believe. I also believe he is either full of shit ...or Rumpelminz. Rumpel,minz or stilskin, whatever,i am positive knows nothing about the Holman Decree which stated that it was discriminatory for the city to concentrate poor folks in the same area like the government has a reputation of doing as their dual two faced racist past has shown. Read "Lies My Teacher Told Me" and alot of you may finally come to grips with the truth about how the game truly started and the pattern that exists so it can continue. The housing projects i grew up in were torn down and never should have been built over Bassetts Creek to begin with. So,chopsikya # 6:32,( that's Hangul,mungjung ha) go back to sleep and next time you wake up maybe your boy will be out of Lino Lakes...on his way to St.Peters. Thank you Don Samuels,John Hoff, Megan Goodmundson and "Irv" johnson and all others who do the footwork and walk the walk. Good Day.

Johnny Northside! said...

Rap sheet for Antwon Delanton Spells, not all these entries may represent actual convictions.

Citation Number Defendant Info Filed/Location/Judicial Officer Type/Status Charge(s)
27-CR-94-019806
SPELLS, ANTWON DELANTON
09/27/1969
03/15/1994
Hennepin Criminal/Traffic/Petty Downtown
Crim/Traf Mandatory
Closed
RECKLESS DISCHARGE OF FIREARM Aid/Abet - GOC
5TH DEG POSSESS CRACK COCAINE Not applicable - GOC
FELON IN POSSESSION OF A PISTOL Not applicable - GOC
27-CR-95-066613
SPELLS, ANTWON DELANTON
09/27/1969
08/02/1995
Hennepin Criminal/Traffic/Petty Downtown
Crim/Traf Mandatory
Closed
ATTEMPTED ARSON THIRD DEGREE MISDEMEANOR Attempt to Commit - GOC
POSSESSION OF EXPOLSIVES OR INCENDIARY DEVICES Not applicable - GOC
19-K0-95-002540
SPELLS, ANTWON DELANTON
09/27/1969
12/22/1995
Dakota-Hastings - Criminal/Traffic/Petty
Felony
Converted Closed
CHECK FORGERY (AGG) Not applicable - GOC
OFFER FORGED CHECK (AGG) Not applicable - GOC
19-K7-97-001275
SPELLS, ANTWON DELANTON
09/27/1969
06/05/1997
Dakota-Hastings - Criminal/Traffic/Petty
Felony
Converted Closed
BURGLARY - 3RD DEGREE Not applicable - GOC
RECEIVING STOLEN PROPERTY Not applicable - GOC
27-CR-01-077020
SPELLS, ANTWON DELANTON
09/27/1969
09/17/2001
Hennepin Criminal/Traffic/Petty Downtown
Crim/Traf Mandatory
Closed
THEFT
DISORDERLY CONDUCT
27-CR-01-103764
SPELLS, ANTWON DELANTON
09/27/1969
12/18/2001
Hennepin Criminal/Traffic/Petty Downtown
Crim/Traf Mandatory
Closed
OFFERING A FORGED CHECK Not applicable - GOC
FINANCIAL EXPLOIT-IDENTITY THEFT Not applicable - GOC
27-CR-02-039729
SPELLS, ANTWON DELANTON
09/27/1969
05/21/2002
Hennepin Criminal/Traffic/Petty Downtown
Crim/Traf Mandatory
Closed
ATTEMPTED THEFT OF PROPERTY Attempt to Commit - GOC
27-CR-03-030112
4030629986
SPELLS, ANTWON DELANTON
09/27/1969
04/30/2003
Hennepin Criminal/Traffic/Petty Southdale
Crim/Traf Mandatory
Closed
RECEIVING/POSSESSING STOLEN PROPERT
27-CR-03-036506
SPELLS, ANTWON DELANTON
09/27/1969
05/30/2003
Hennepin Criminal/Traffic/Petty Downtown
Crim/Traf Mandatory
Under Court Jurisdiction
LURK W/INTENT
62-K2-04-000199
SPELLS, ANTWON DELANTON
09/27/1969
01/16/2004
Ramsey Criminal/Traffic/Petty Downtown
Gross Misdemeanor
Closed-Physical File Destroyed
THEFT GM Not applicable - GOC
27-CR-03-086158
SPELLS, ANTWON DELANTON
09/27/1969
04/29/2004
Hennepin Criminal/Traffic/Petty Downtown
Crim/Traf Mandatory
Closed
DAMAGE TO PROPERTY IN THE THIRD DEGREE
27-CR-04-046081
SPELLS, ANTWON DELANTON
09/27/1969
07/19/2004
Hennepin Criminal/Traffic/Petty Downtown
Crim/Traf Mandatory
Under Court Jurisdiction
ATTEMPTED CONTROLLED SUB CRIME 5TH DEG-POSSESSION Not applicable - GOC
27-CR-04-070549
SPELLS, ANTWON DELANTON
09/27/1969
12/03/2004
Hennepin Criminal/Traffic/Petty Downtown
Crim/Traf Mandatory
Closed
ATTEMPTED THEFT OVER $500 Attempt to Commit - GOC
27-CR-05-007077
SPELLS, ANTWON DELANTON
09/27/1969
01/31/2005
Hennepin Criminal/Traffic/Petty Downtown
Crim/Traf Mandatory
Closed
THEFT
27-CR-06-012389
SPELLS, ANTWON DELANTON
09/27/1969
04/20/2006
Hennepin Criminal/Traffic/Petty Downtown
Crim/Traf Mandatory
Closed
ATTEMPTED CRIMINAL SEXUAL CONDUCT IN THE 1ST DE Not applicable - GOC